An empty laboratory
Plan the layout, twin, skills, and workflows around the scientific goal.
From scientific goals to new laboratory capabilities.
Self-Building Labs build and retain the controls, skills, workflows, and layouts that new experiments need.
Find the controls, operations, and procedures the lab needs.
Build digital twins, interfaces, and robot skills. Simulate operations before approved physical trials.
Refine operations with physical feedback. Save successful skills with clear reuse conditions.
Self-driving labs run and optimize experiments using existing capabilities. SBL develops new ones, starting from a manual lab or SDL.
| Capability | Traditional lab | Self-driving lab | Self-building lab |
|---|---|---|---|
| Running experiments | Researcher-led procedures | Automation with existing capabilities | Workflows with capabilities built as needed |
| Adding capabilities | Researcher development | Usually specialist engineering | Agent development and validation; human oversight |
| Retaining knowledge | Procedures and experience | Setup-specific protocols and scripts | Reusable skills with validation and use conditions |
Researchers set goals and resolve uncertainties. SBL develops the capabilities to act.
Reuse what the lab has. Build what the next experiment needs.
Plan the layout, twin, skills, and workflows around the scientific goal.
Add a twin, controls, skills, and workflows to existing instruments.
Rearrange existing equipment, update the twin, and adapt the skills.
Reuse equipment and skills. Build the new workflow and missing capabilities.
Model equipment from images and documents. Develop skills through simulation and physical feedback.
SBL built a joint-servoing interface for the robot arm.
Force and torque feedback guided fine insertion beyond camera and calibration accuracy.
Combine controls, manipulation, and procedures into reusable workflows. Return control to the agent when operating conditions fail.
For CdS synthesis, SBL developed liquid handling and coordinated transfer, sealing, regrasping, and optical measurement.
Researchers set goals and approved plans. Execution used runtime guardrails and sensory feedback.
CdS–thiourea quantum dots
Emission 560 nm · Excitation 360 nm
Explore the 96-well pH and reagent screen: select a well and timepoint.
Select a well to inspect its fluorescence.
The goal is lasting capabilities that other labs can reuse.
Test whether reusing validated skills improves performance and reduces engineering effort and human intervention.
Share twins, controls, skills, records, and validation conditions. A capability map could match goals to equipment and gaps. Check transfers locally.
Build on available equipment in field stations, hazardous sites, or space, despite limited resources, communication, and support.
J.B. acknowledges funding from the Eric and Wendy Schmidt AI in Science Postdoctoral Fellowship Program, a program by Schmidt Futures. A.A.-G. thanks Anders G. Frøseth for his generous support and acknowledges the generous support of Natural Resources Canada and the Canada 150 Research Chairs program.
This work was supported by the AI2050 program of Schmidt Sciences. This research is part of the University of Toronto’s Acceleration Consortium, which receives funding from the CFREF-2022-00042 Canada First Research Excellence Fund. This work was supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under Agreement No. HR0011262E022.
@misc{bai2026selfbuildinglabs,
title={Self-Building Labs},
author={Jiaru Bai and Yuchi Zhao and Han Hao and Miroslav Bogdanovic and Yang Cao and Varinia Bernales and Alán Aspuru-Guzik},
year={2026},
eprint={2610.23826},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.AI},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23826},
}